A properly set up server does not respond to junk emails. The AntEspam filters can assist in this process.
Flipside thought - examination of these emails tell us something about the source of spam and thereby give us clues in the fight against spam
X-ClientAddr: 65.243.234.36 Received: from md1.itwsourcing.com (mail.itwsourcing.com [65.243.234.36]) by srv01.info-world.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j17Fn9E27940 for kmocmhe@sister-hazel.com; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 15:49:09 GMT Received: from md1.itwsourcing.com (localhost) by md1.itwsourcing.com (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with internal id DCQ11024; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:38:45 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:38:45 -0600 (CST) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem MAILER-DAEMON@md1.itwsourcing.com Message-Id: 200502071538.DCQ11024@md1.itwsourcing.com To: kmocmhe@sister-hazel.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: {Bad Spam?} Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) X-www.antespam.co.uk-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=705.9, required 8, ALMOSTRUBBISH -1.00, APPLES3 4.00, APPLES4 4.00, APPLES5 2.00, APPLESA 0.01, APPLESB 0.01, APPLESC 0.01, APPLESD 8.00, APPLESX1 27.00, APPLESX5 1.00, APPLESX6 1.00, APPLESZ5 1.00, ASPACC -0.01, BLOCKPLUS 130.00, COMPLETERUBBISH 1.00, DELETEAFTER 20.01, DELETEREMAINDER 0.01, DIFFAPPLE1 0.01, DINSPECT 0.01, FAILURE_NOTICE_1 -0.12, MAILER_DAEMON 2.00, NOTHINGIN 20.00, OUTPHAZE 1.00, OUTPHAZORED 66.00, OUTSHINE 1.00, REALLYNOTHINGIN 300.00, REALLYXNOTHINGIN 5.00, SUPERBLACKITS 105.00, VTEST1 6.00, XNOTHINGIN 1.00, score 1.00) X-www.antespam.co.uk-SpamScore: ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss The original message was received at Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:38:15 -0600 (CST) from adsl-68-72-92-58.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.72.92.58] Received: from adsl-68-72-92-58.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net (adsl-68-72-92-58.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.72.92.58]) by md1.itwsourcing.com (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with SMTP id DCQ10749; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:38:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from judy.webhost4.alterusa.com id CFB61264DE; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:29:37 +0600 Received: by dependent.webhost9.starnetusa.net (Postfix, from userid 050) id CFB66394DE; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:31:37 -0300 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:33:37 +0600 Message-Id: 21831130090241.CFB7196DE@amity.starnetusa.net To: tjscr217@pmifeg.com Subject: don`t be a moron Clement Subject: don`t be a moron Clement Date: Mon, February 7, 2005 15:33 To: tjscr217@pmifeg.com Priority: NormalNo further content . . .
X-ClientAddr: 211.227.105.228 Received: from cantillon.demon.co.uk ([211.227.105.228]) Message-ID: AJGGIGGKPCDOGFGGJOPICHEIALAB.d_d_staffordgd@arved.de From: "Demetrius D. Stafford" d_d_staffordgd@arved.de Subject: {Spam?} other people in your area that want to cheat X-www.antespam.co.uk-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=27.5, required 8, ALMOSTRUBBISH -1.00, ASPACC -0.01, ASPACE -0.01, ASSURD 1.00, BASE64_ENC_TEXT 5.50, BASSURD1 5.00, BODY_WORDS 7.50, CHERRY4 -18.00, CHERRY5 -19.00, CHERRYY2 -30.00, DELETEREMAINDER 0.01, HTML_10_20 1.36, HTML_MESSAGE 0.10, INSPECT2 0.01, MIME_HTML_ONLY 1.00, MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE -5.00, NEWCH2a -2.00, NEWNEG2 0.01, NEWPIP1 0.01, ORANGE2 1.00, ORANGEER 0.01, OUTCHERRY2 30.00, OUTCHEVAL 30.00, OUTNUMBER 1.00, OUTPHAZE 1.00, PASSIONATC 1.00, PASSIONATE 1.00, PASSIONFRUIT 1.00, PIPS2 3.00, PROBPLUS -10.00, SPAMMERFRUITS 1.00, WIDOWER 20.00, score 1.00) X-www.antespam.co.uk-SpamScore: sssssssssssssssssssssssssss Hello, come to the world's largest adlullt datti1ng place. You're going to find people here that are looking for just about everything. Wives that need to find secret people to hook up with. People that are looking for alternative lifestyle type things. Women that want to try aye null ex. Women that want to be domininiatted by men and so on. Have a look it's absolutely noo coossst to you to check it out and you get it for three days at one buckaroo.
Return-Path: Postmaster@mail.nifty.ne.jp X-ClientAddr: 192.47.24.155 Received: from ums5.nifty.ne.jp (ums5.nifty.ne.jp [192.47.24.155]) Received: (from root@localhost) by ums5.nifty.ne.jp id BAA26824; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 01:08:20 +0900 (JST) From: Postmaster@mail.nifty.ne.jp Message-Id: 200502071608.BAA26824@ums5.nifty.ne.jp Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 01:08:20 +0900 Subject: {Bad Spam?} Returned mail: GFA00772 did not receive a mail To: RRPWXSWYCWJ@sister-hazel.com X-www.antespam.co.uk-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=686.4, required 8, ALMOSTRUBBISH -1.00, APPLES2 2.00, APPLES5 2.00, APPLES6 10.00, APPLES7b 7.00, APPLESA 0.01, APPLESB 0.01, APPLESC 0.01, APPLESD 8.00, APPLESX4 5.00, APPLESX5 1.00, APPLESX6 1.00, APPLESY2 26.00, APPLESZ5 1.00, BLOCKPLUS 130.00, COMPLETERUBBISH 1.00, DELETEAFTER 20.01, DELETEREMAINDER 0.01, DIFFAPPLE1 0.01, DINSPECT 0.01, FAILURE_NOTICE_1 -0.12, NOTHINGIN 20.00, NO_REAL_NAME 1.50, OUTNUMBER 1.00, OUTPHAZE 1.00, OUTPHAZORED 66.00, OUTSHINE 1.00, PHAZING 70.00, REALLYNOTHINGIN 300.00, REALLYXNOTHINGIN 5.00, VTEST1 6.00, XNOTHINGIN 1.00, score 1.00) X-www.antespam.co.uk-SpamScore: ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ----- Unsent reason follows ----- GFA00772 could not receive a mail that you had sent. GFA00772 is not acceping any mail. ----- Unsent message follows ----- Return-Path: RRPWXSWYCWJ@sister-hazel.com Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 08:01:43 -0800 From: "Tyrone Ballard" RRPWXSWYCWJ@sister-hazel.com Reply-To: "Tyrone Ballard" RRPWXSWYCWJ@sister-hazel.com To: "Dus" dus@niftyserve.or.jp Subject: Jeanine Received: from 202.248.44.120 ([211.223.186.173]) by ums530.nifty.ne.jp with SMTP id j17G2v8M002195; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 01:03:01 +0900 Message-Id: 200502071603.j17G2v8M002195@ums530.nifty.ne.jp X-Message-Info: E23JIH88TXfn6kdZOLealVU191BEQ792bioUFZrfW1 Received: from 136.224.148.244 by ip-225-4-5-42.vmh.RRPWXSWYCWJ@sister-hazel.c om (AppleMailServer 68.4.0.9) id 2844784662 via NDR; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 08:01:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--5807953138022644054" ----- Message body suppressed -----
X-ClientAddr: 64.78.59.236 Received: from postfixr.intermedia.net (postfixr.intermedia.net [64.78.59.236]) Received: from postfix6.intermedia.net ([64.78.61.227]) by postfixr.intermedia.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:43:56 -0800 Received: by postfix6.intermedia.net (Postfix) id D40F9375E6; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:43:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:43:56 -0800 (PST) From: MAILER-DAEMON@postfix6.intermedia.net (Mail Delivery System) Subject: {Bad Spam?} Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: ktoqi@sister-hazel.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="55363375AC.1107809036/postfix6.intermedia.net" Message-Id: 20050207204356.D40F9375E6@postfix6.intermedia.net X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2005 20:43:56.0985 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE875A90:01C50D55] X-www.antespam.co.uk-Information: Please see www.antespam.co.uk for more information X-www.antespam.co.uk-MScan: Not scanned: please visit www.antespam.co.uk for details X-www.antespam.co.uk-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=502.9, required 8, ALMOSTALLRUBBISH 1.00, ALMOSTRUBBISH -1.00, APPLES2 2.00, APPLES3 4.00, APPLES4 4.00, APPLES7b 7.00, APPLESA 0.01, APPLESC 0.01, APPLESX1 27.00, APPLESX2 27.00, APPLESX3 20.00, APPLESX6 1.00, APPLESZ5 1.00, BODY_LOTS_OF_WORDS 7.50, CHERRY3 -3.00, COMBAST 50.00, COMBINATION5 50.00, COMBINATIONL4 33.00, COMBINATIONY4 10.00, COMPLETERUBBISH 1.00, DELETABLE 1.00, DELETEAFTER 20.01, DELETENEXT 20.01, DELETEREMAINDER 0.01, DINSPECT 0.01, ENGLISHSENDER -10.00, INSPECT3 0.01, LETTOMETER 35.00, MAILER_DAEMON 2.00, MILDBAST3 30.00, NEARLYALLRUBBISH 1.00, NEWAPPLES 0.40, NEWID 1.00, NEWNEG2 0.01, NEWNEG3 9.00, NEWPIP1 0.01, NEWVIRUS1 1.00, ORANGE2 1.00, ORANGE4 2.00, ORANGEER 0.01, PIPS2 3.00, PRODUCT -27.00, SUPERBLACKITS 105.00, VTEST1 6.00, WIDOW 20.00, WIDOW3a 45.00, X_ORIG -5.00, score 1.00) X-www.antespam.co.uk-SpamScore: ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss This is the Postfix program at host postfix6.intermedia.net. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail toIf you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The Postfix program papapump@optperformance.com: host mail.optperformance.com[206.40.48.151] said: 550 5.1.1 papapump@optperformance.com is not a valid mailbox (in reply to RCPT TO command) rjbaty@optperformance.com: host mail.optperformance.com[206.40.48.151] said: 550 5.1.1 rjbaty@optperformance.com is not a valid mailbox (in reply to RCPT TO command) snbs12a@optperformance.com: host mail.optperformance.com[206.40.48.151] said: 550 5.1.1 snbs12a@optperformance.com is not a valid mailbox (in reply to RCPT TO command) spruce9@optperformance.com: host mail.optperformance.com[206.40.48.151] said: 550 5.1.1 spruce9@optperformance.com is not a valid mailbox (in reply to RCPT TO command) ssirles@optperformance.com: host mail.optperformance.com[206.40.48.151] said: 550 5.1.1 ssirles@optperformance.com is not a valid mailbox (in reply to RCPT TO command) stinie7@optperformance.com: host mail.optperformance.com[206.40.48.151] said: 550 5.1.1 stinie7@optperformance.com is not a valid mailbox (in reply to RCPT TO command) susanna_koepsel@optperformance.com: host mail.optperformance.com[206.40.48.151] said: 550 5.1.1 susanna_koepsel@optperformance.com is not a valid mailbox (in reply to RCPT TO command) tictoc15@optperformance.com: host mail.optperformance.com[206.40.48.151] said: 550 5.1.1 tictoc15@optperformance.com is not a valid mailbox (in reply to RCPT TO command) Here's the original spam email: Received: from localhost (postfix6.intermedia.net [127.0.0.1]) by postfix6.intermedia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55363375AC; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:43:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from postfix6.intermedia.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postfix6.intermedia.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09503-10; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:43:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from AMontpellier-152-1-6-245.w81-251.abo.wanadoo.fr (AMontpellier-152-1-6-245.w81-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.251.160.245]) by postfix6.intermedia.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DEDB375C0; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:43:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from televise.anu.viola.au ([75.221.216.253] helo=anu.vote.au) by smtp0.brian.co with esmtp id 1A5Ys6-347184-19 Message-ID: NCBwilliamsburgurgentAKEOAA.cowpunch.cheryl@cde.Com> Sender: freeradius-devel-ktoqi@sister-hazel.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:37:31 -0600 From: "Roger Brooks" ktoqi@sister-hazel.com To: papapump@optperformance.com Subject: [SPAM] New Drug store Chester X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.145 tagged_above=-999 required=3 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR, INFO_TLD, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, URIBL_AB_SURBL, URIBL_OB_SURBL, URIBL_SBL, URIBL_SC_SURBL, URIBL_WS_SURBL X-Spam-Level: ************** X-Spam-Flag: YES Refill Notification Ref: WQ-314471907701321 Dear papapump@optperformance.com, Our automated system has identified that you most likely are ready to refill your recent online pharmaceutical order. To help you get your needed supply, we have sent this reminder notice. Please use the refill system http://poise.m3dspective.info/?wid=100069 to obtain your item in the quickest possible manner. Thank you for your time and we look forward to assisting you. Sincerely, Roger Brooks demiscible iq drug dsr aunt gx slosh kf afghan eic baptiste hy golly ktj accountant qg june awj ossify vf wrapup bk christendom ukz cleft naa furthermore kf georgetown isv repugnant fhx yak nsk earsplitting jx
Unsurpassed Spam blocking for any email address published on a webpage. Monitored spam-bin minimises risks of losing wanted emails. Don't trust services where you do not know what mails you are losing! Don't trust anti-spam software which has to be downloaded onto your computer.
In contrast to one-solution-fits all software you install on your machine or worse, buy from an ISP, we tailor our spam remedy service to the needs of our individual clients and our results benefit from years of research. You do not need to download software on your computer: we block the spam at our server.
If you want to buy maintained filter service to run on your version of SpamAssassin, please enquire: guide £4000 to £30,000 depending on the size of your organisation. They can save you this in problems your server will encounter running Bayes and large databases - and is much more accurate!
CONTACT US